Human Society

In discussion of inhumane treatment, a controversial issue is whether animals are entitled to their rights. plot of ground some argue that only humans contain rights, others contend that animals should have the same privileges as humans. The author of A Change of Heart about Animals, Jeremy Rifkin, claims that animals should have better treatment. Rifkin rhetorically changes ones view on this subject without the consent of the reader. Rifkin begins by showing the animals human qualities, then giving a snack counter statement to common objections, and finally ends it by utilizing negative address.Rifkins expressive strategy is to note the similarities between animals and humans. Rifkin mentions Koko, a 300-pound gorilla. Koko was able to learn sign language and yet some people never even learn how to communicate in sign language. Rifkin also notes the similarity between rats and humans. He states, Recent studies in the brain chemistry of rats show that when they play, their brains release large amounts of dopamine, a petrochemical associated with pleasure and excitement in human beings.Rifkin shows that not only do animals have the big businessman to learn the things we do, but also have some features that we do. After providing the analogy between the two, Rifkin anticipated that many people would view animals as one of them. The sequel is that to believe that animals are not any different than us, so they shouldnt be in the brutal situations they face every day. It also, makes much more probably to accept the statement he makes based on the similarities he provides, that we must work to increase the benevolent treatment of animals.Among Rifkins subtly persuasive strategies is to bring up the common objections and give a counter statement. Jeremy Rifkin for showing us that science supports what we pet owners and animal rights activists have known in our hearts all along animals have feelings and abilities not very different from humans. When will more p eople begin to realize that we share this world with many creatures deserving of our care and complaisance? Animals have a right to live without being confined, exploited, and tormented.