H. R. 3 No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act Essay

H. R. 3 No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act - Essay ExampleAt present, the law allows federal backing to support abortions albeit, in certain critical situations, such as rape or incest or cases where the livelihood of the woman in questions, is in danger on account of complications arising out of pregnancy. The recent change is liable(predicate) to repeal health care reform and permanently put an end to publicly funded abortion in the U.S. - regardless of whether it is a direct accompaniment or via tax credits or any former(a) similar subsidy. The No Tax Payer Funding for Abortion Act, seeks to restrict the all the public sources of funding such as the health insurance providers (like Medicaid) as well as other private insurers, who pull up stakes be penalized for offering finance for abortion or other similar reproductive health reportage (Care2, 2011). This No Tax Payer Funding for Abortion Act, is a harsh and extreme measure taken by the pro-life supporters, which could cr itically damage the opportunities available to women by eliminating all coverage of abortion, including private insurers. This composition discusses the impact of such funding restrictions on womens health the role of nursing and proposes changes by delegacy of recommendations. Statement of purpose The H.R.3 Act seeks to restrict the publicly funded abortions across all states, including the ones funded by private insurers, by levying heavy taxes on those providing finance for such purposes, against the federal regulations. This paper opposes the current amendment and suggests recommendations for change, which are in the larger benefit of the society, and particularly women. Importance of the give away Restrictive funding for abortion is a tricky issue with several far reaching consequences on the social life and health of women. The fact that unplanned / unsuitable pregnancies are a matter of serious concern with regard to public health cannot be denied. confused deaths are re corded annually on account of un base hit abortions worldwide leading to the issue world given prime significance in the health policies of nations. The internal laws and regulations have a direct and inscribe impact on womens health, since their access to safe abortions is heavily dependent on the national health policies. active 61 per cent of the worlds population lives in countries who have a safe and monotone access to abortion while the rest have access to abortions with certain pre-conditions. Studies have shown that restrictive national health related laws, often culminate into issues of inequality, putting the lives of minority populations and women of color into vulnerable situations and at eminent risk of sexual violence (Crane & Smith, 2006). In countries where funding for abortion is restricted, leads to women turning to unhealthier options, leading to further declination of their health and safety. Women who are victims of sexual violence and unwanted pregnancie s are liable to receive prompt and safe access to counseling, medical facilities and compassionate services, and any change in the provision of health services, where the laws are do stricter, would lead to a poor and weaker public health system (Levine, 2007). The health of women in dire lack of abortion, either for health or socio-economic reasons, will be endangered purely on account of semipolitical disapproval of medically essential facilities. It is on account of these reasons that the issue of abortion and